Who Needs a Bitcoin ETF? Crypto Scoffs during SEC Rejections

Over the past two days, the account on bitcoin sell traded supports (ETFs) in the U.S. has felt like a rollercoaster.

Up until Wednesday, all eyes were examination for a final preference on two futures-backed bitcoin ETF proposals set to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and combined by ProShares.

However, the ensuing decision not only shot down ProShares’ twin proposals, but 5 others like it by Direxion and another two by GraniteShares, with the latter to be listed on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe).

Then, as if matters had not been rousing enough, the SEC announced the following day a petition to examination all 9 condemnation decisions in suitability to Rule 431(e) of the Commission’s central “Rules of Practice,” observant that until such a time the examination is finish all such decisions would be stayed.

In truth, it isn’t as if the SEC has never incited around to re-examine their rulings in a identical demeanour before. Just last month, the results of one such examination over the Winklevoss bitcoin ETF was released, eventually re-affirming the initial rejection.

Still, the fallout from this week’s events on the matter of regulatory capitulation over a bitcoin ETF has left many in the crypto village cloyed over what feels to be a stability ascending battle.

In fact, some have taken to Twitter in accusing the agency, in part jokingly, of using their powers of regulatory condemnation then examination to “stress test” the bitcoin markets.

To be fair, marketplace strategy was a pivotal reason specified for the initial condemnation of all 9 ETF proposals, though to the wider crypto village this preference was taken essentially as a fusillade of attacks by the group deliberately meant to impede the expansion of the industry.

A Glimmer Of Hope?

Interestingly enough, the SEC did stop just brief of handing down a rejecting on all 10 bitcoin ETF proposals pronounced to be decided on in the subsequent two months. One stays in this honour put onward by VanEck and SolidX for a earthy bitcoin ETF that commentators in the past have touted as being the strongest claimant of the batch.

As such, joined with the existence that technically the other 9 disapprovals are now tentative underneath SEC review, certain commentators on Twitter see the perfection of this week’s events as reason to trust there might just be a vital annulment of happening in entrance weeks.


Who really cares?

Yet, critical to note in the midst of the discussion, is a aria of sourness voiced by some per all the hullabaloo and courtesy bitcoin ETFs have been sparking as of late. The reoccurring critique by such commentators being that bitcoin ETFs aren’t all that interesting, let alone, required for the continued expansion of crypto markets.

As such, to the ones that reason bitcoin as an item otherly in inlet from mainstream financial resources and not concordant in the guise of institutional investment vehicles such at ETFs, the rejections by the SEC have been touted as “a blessing in disguise” and a preference for examination as zero more than “overrated” news.

Agree or disagree, for the time being, regulatory capitulation over a bitcoin ETF stays rarely suppositional here in the U.S.

For “TenaciousJ” that means one elementary fact:   

Computer picture around Shutterstock

Article source: https://www.coindesk.com/who-needs-a-bitcoin-etf-crypto-scoffs-at-sec-rejections